1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following additions to the fourth and fifth of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

【The medical records of the Lee Dong-dong Hospital, attached to the Plaintiff’s statement of grounds of appeal and rebuttals brief on July 4, 2014, showed that the deceased had been young as a female patient of '82 years of age with respect to the deceased, but did not seem to have been too far away from 50 years of age.

While stating the purport, the above content is deemed to have been written based on the deceased’s statement, and it was not revealed that the cause of the trial is not revealed, it is difficult to recognize the Plaintiff’s assertion even if taking into account the above materials.

Meanwhile, according to the evidence No. 17, the defendant may recognize the fact that he decided the deceased as a victim of compulsory mobilization on March 31, 201 as of March 31, 201, but the requirements to recognize the victim of compulsory mobilization during the period of a large-scale defense and the requirements to recognize the victim of compulsory mobilization during the period of a large-scale defense are different. Thus, the disposition of this case cannot be deemed contradictory or unlawful on the ground that the defendant decided the deceased as a victim of compulsory mobilization during the period of a large-scale defense.

[Judgment]

2. The judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.