The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal and each statement of the victims in the investigative agency and the court below did not have credibility, but the court below found the victims guilty of each forced indecent act. Thus, the court below erred by misunderstanding the facts and misapprehending the legal principles.

2. The following circumstances are revealed by comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below: ① at the investigative agency and court of the court below, the victim D stated that the Defendant was her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her, and the victim F

The statement is consistent with the main part of the statement, in light of the empirical rule, there is no part that is unreasonable or inconsistent in the statement itself; ② D and F reported to the police immediately after the instant case and stated the facts of damage; ③ D, F and Defendant do not clearly indicate the motive or reason for D and F to make a false statement against the Defendant; ④ Defendant was also at the prosecutor’s office, and F’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

In full view of the circumstances, such as the fact that the court below made a statement in the court below, and the court below also recognized that the son’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

Therefore, the defendant's argument is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.