1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

The reasoning of this court's judgment is as follows, except for the part of the judgment stated in Chapters 3, 10, and 4, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1

【In light of the following circumstances, Gap's evidence Nos. 5, 8, 9, 12, and 13, Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 4 (including each number), and Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 4 (including each number), and the overall purport of testimony and arguments of witnesses D on September 23, 2008, the plaintiff lent 200 million won funds related to "J Corporation" to the non-party company within a fixed period of 2.5% of interest per month, the due date of payment within three months, and the above loan claim was established as the secured claim with a maximum debt amount of KRW 200 million for the real estate of this case owned by the non-party company as the joint representative of the non-party company. ② The non-party company was established as a collateral to pay only part of the above loan debt and was unable to receive the remainder of the debt amount, the plaintiff company's joint representative director of the non-party company shall be paid KRW 390,000 in proportion to the agreement between the plaintiff and non-party company No. 390.

3. On May 23, 2012, the Plaintiff asserted that “The remaining debt amount of KRW 45 million was not repaid from a company other than the company other than the lawsuit, and that G was responsible for and repaid, and that the instant performance agreement was made out,” and that only G was made a security deposit of KRW 45 million and its agreement.