beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months, by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won.
However, the defendant A.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A Co., Ltd. is a corporation established on Oct. 20, 2004 and established on Oct. 20, 2004 for the purpose of the feed manufacturing business, etc., and Defendant A is the representative director of the Co., Ltd. B, who exercises overall control over and manages all the affairs concerning the safety and health of workers engaged in the work
1. Defendant A
(a) A business owner who violates the Occupational Safety and Health Act and dies by occupational negligence due to the death of workers shall take measures necessary for the prevention of hazards caused by machinery, apparatus, and other equipment when conducting a business;
In this regard, (1) In the case of heating and drying of non-hazardous substances, the structure of a building in which a drying room is installed, among the drying equipment for dangerous substances the maximum amount of solid or liquid fuels of which is at least ten kilograms per hour, shall be an independent single-story building, and gas, steam or dust generated in the course of construction shall be installed in a structure that can be discharged to a safe place.
(2) Safety valves or heat plates equipped with the performance and standards for explosion prevention shall be installed in order to prevent explosions caused by excessive pressure on the facilities of pressure vessels.
(3) Where any defect in machinery or protective devices is found, the relevant machinery or protective devices shall be used by workers after maintaining them without fail, and the use of the relevant machinery, protective devices, etc. shall be prohibited until maintaining them
Nevertheless, the Defendant was aware of the fact that gas, steam, or dust generated in a combined place with other processes, not a single-story building, was installed in a structure, which discharges gas, steam, or dust from the place where work is carried out, and that the Defendant was aware of the fact that the drieder provided a drieder with a drieder with a drieder, and that the drieder’s drieder’s drieder was considerably worn out in May 2018.