logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2014.02.06 2013고단1870
절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2013 Highest 1870]

1. On July 19, 2013, at around 16:30, the Defendant discovered one half of the shape of body project, one half of the market value of which is equivalent to KRW 80,000, and one half of the market value of which is equivalent to KRW 10,000, in the market value of the victim’s possession, of which the victim C exceeded 80,000, in order to play water on the bridge between South Yan-dong and Yancheon-gu, Yancheon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on July 19, 2013.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

[Attachment 2013 Highest 2668]

2. On November 27, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 14:47 on November 27, 2013, around “E” located in Yansan-gu, Yansan-si; (b) around such a place, the Defendant stored a fluor, a fluor, a victim F, in the market value of KRW 4,00,00, into the fluor of Australia; and (c) stolen this.

Summary of Evidence

[2013 Highest 1870]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Records of seizure and the list [2013 senior group 2668];

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crimes;

1. From among concurrent crimes, it is reasonable to impose a sentence on the Defendant in the light of the fact that the Defendant had been punished several times including the same kind of crime, and that there was no agreement with the victims, and that the Defendant committed another crime after being investigated and indicted as a result of larceny as stated in paragraph (1) of Article 37 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes, it is reasonable to impose a sentence on the Defendant. However, the degree of damage is minor, partial damage was returned to the victims, and other circumstances that form the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relation, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

arrow