The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (ten months of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence, and forty hours of compliance driving) is too uneasible and unfair.

2. In light of the fact that the Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case committed each of the crimes of this case, which caused physical damage by negligence, such as violation of the duty of care on the front side while driving a harming vehicle without a driver's license while driving the harming vehicle without the driver's license in the state of 0.241% alcohol level during the labing of lab, it is necessary to punish the Defendant with severe punishment.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant led to the confession of the crime and reflects on the fact of the crime, the fact that the defendant was punished four times only by a fine such as the above drinking driver's previous offense, the fact that there was no other criminal record, and that the victim agreed to the insurance with the victim, separately from the fact that the insurance money was paid through the insurance purchased by the harming vehicle

In addition, the lower court did not recognize that the sentence against the Defendant was too unafford, and that there was no special change in the judgment of the Defendant in light of the overall circumstances, and all other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, environment, sexual conduct, motive for committing a crime, and circumstances before and after committing a crime.

3. If so, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.