The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

The defendant in the factory room is a person who is engaged in driving service of the BM5 vehicle volume.

1. On May 20, 2017, the Defendant was operating a front road of D Mart, located in Daegu Northern-gu C, Daegu-gu, on the surface of the road, along the surface of the road at the seat of D Mart parking lot.

In this case, a person engaged in driving service was the duty of care to properly see the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting this, the victim E (e.g., the victim E (e., the age 69) operated directly from the left side of the Defendant vehicle to the seat of the dormitory of the Daegu University of Health and University on the ground of the e-mail apartment located behind the left side of the Defendant vehicle (e.g., the victim suffered injury, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, by conflicting the FSP car volume and the right-hand even part of the FSP car.

2. The foregoing accident destroyed the property that requires repair equivalent to KRW 4,213,468 of the cost of repairing the damaged vehicle F.

Maz.

1. Applicable legal provisions: Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act;

2. Grounds for dismissing a public prosecution: Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (the victim's expression of intention not to punish him/her on June 23, 2017).

3. Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.