1. The defendants' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as follows. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as follows. Except for the addition of the judgment as to the allegations made by the Defendants in the trial, the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 3: (a) add “this Agreement” to the end of Part 13 (hereinafter referred to as “instant Agreement”).

Under paragraph 3, “after 6 years’,” the following shall be added to “Defendant B’s account (Account Number I).”

2. Judgment on the defendants' assertion

가. 피고들의 주장 1) 피고들은 원고가 피고들에게 5억 원의 투자를 유치해 주는 것을 조건으로 이 사건 약정을 하였는데, 원고가 위 5억 원 투자 유치 조건을 이행하지 못하였으므로 피고들은 이 사건 약정을 이행할 의무가 없다. 2) F은 원고와 쏘렐 신발 및 아디다스 가젤 신발 공급계약을 체결할 당시 원고가 제품을 수령한 후 36시간 이내에 제품의 이상 유무를 통지하지 않을 경우 하자가 없는 것으로 간주하기로 약정하였는데, 원고는 제품을 수령한 후 36시간 이내에 하자 통지를 하지 않았으므로 F은 원고에 대하여 채무불이행 책임을 부담하지 않는다.

3) Around August 12, 2015, Defendant C repaid the obligation under the instant agreement by depositing KRW 20 million among the obligations. The Defendants withdrawn the defense of the aforementioned repayment in the reference document submitted on May 5, 2016, which was after the conclusion of the pleadings. (B) Determination 1) comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence and the witness J’s testimony and the purport of the entire pleadings, the aforementioned witness’s testimony and evidence No. 3 alone is entered into the agreement with the Plaintiff, and the Defendants are subject to the condition that the Plaintiff attracts the Defendants to make an investment of KRW 50 million.