Defendant

D As a fine of 4 million won, Defendant B, C, F, I, and K shall be sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment, and Defendant E shall be sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment.

Punishment of the crime

On April 12, 2017, Defendant K was sentenced to six months of imprisonment and one year of suspended execution as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Incheon District Court on April 12, 2017, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on April 20, 2017.

Defendant

On June 29, 2017, I was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for a violation of road traffic law (drinking driving) in the Incheon District Court's Branch Branch of the Incheon District Court on November 17, 2017.

1. Defendant B, Defendant A, and Defendant C’s fraud (victim N) advertised that they did not actually own a vehicle at a price much less than the market price as if they were sold at a high-speed advertising site, etc., and entices customers who wish to purchase the vehicle by advertising the vehicle at a high-speed advertising site, etc., if they reported the above advertising, they actually secure the vehicle and sell the advertising price as it is. As the advertising price is displayed in the exhibition place, if the customer did not have any falsity, the customer would be able to request the customer to cancel the sales price under a false contract or to cancel the sales price for the vehicle without mentioning the contract at the time of the contract. However, as the end of the contract is displayed in the exhibition place, there is a serious difference between the owner information, goods, and prices, etc. of the product, which are advertised differently from the fact, the vehicle owner information, goods, and prices, and so, the customer would have to withdraw the sales price or request the customer to cancel the sales price under the pretext of the contract at the time of the contract.