Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On February 1, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Eastern District Court.
1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) by the Defendant is a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle with B A-Wurd-
On June 25, 2020, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol at around 23:00, and proceeded with the fourth-lane road in the front of Daegu Jung-gu, Seoul along the second line, in the direction of the right angle distance from the dynamic distance.
A person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely examining the front left left.
Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant, while neglecting it and driving in the atmosphere of mast signal, was driven by the victim D (Nam, 24 years old), who was driven by the victim D (Nam, 24 years old), with the part of the front part of the vehicle B-E-Wed, and suffered injury to the victim, such as light salt, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.
2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of the measurement of drinking level) provided that the Defendant failed to comply with a request for a measurement of drinking level conducted by a police officer on three occasions on the ground that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that he/she was driving under the influence of drinking, such as drinking and smelling on the face of a police officer, who was a police officer belonging to the Daegu Middle-gu Police Station G Zone G District of the Daegu Middle-gu Police Station called upon receiving a report by causing a traffic accident from the front of a restaurant near the F market in Daegu-gu to the front of the above Daegu-gu Seoul-gu Seoul-gu Seoul-gu, and that he/she was required by the police officer to take a measurement of drinking level on three occasions due to the reason that he/she was unable to comply with a request for a measurement
Accordingly, the defendant violated Article 44 (1) or (2) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.
Summary of Evidence
1. The court of the defendant;