1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The wounded soldiers in Busan and South-do established a settlement vocational rehabilitation association pursuant to the former Vocational Rehabilitation Act (repealed by Act No. 1369, Jul. 26, 1963; hereinafter “former Vocational Rehabilitation Act”), but the former Vocational Rehabilitation was discontinued and the Korea Veterans Welfare Corporation Act (amended by the Korea Veterans Welfare Corporation Act, Apr. 4, 1981) was enacted on Apr. 4, 1981, which is a rehabilitation division consisting of settlement vocational rehabilitation members (hereinafter “G association”). The association remains in force until now, G members and other persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State in Busan and Busan were established under the name of F (hereinafter “Defendant F”) under the name of F, under the name of the Ministry of Patriots and Veterans Affairs, with automatic power distribution villages from the Ministry of Patriots and Veterans Affairs, automatic control groups as members of the Korea Veterans Welfare Corporation, and with respect to the rehabilitation of synthetic resin, etc. among the members of the Korea Veterans Welfare Corporation as part of the Act.

B. The Plaintiff was a person falling under class 3 of the disability rating under the Act on the Persons of Distinguished Services to the State, and was working as the secretary of Defendant F from October 5, 199, and was admitted to Defendant F on May 10, 2003, and thereafter was elected as the president and the president of the GF and G association on May 23, 2006, and was employed until October 31, 2010.

C. Around April 2012, the Plaintiff withdrawn from Defendant F, and thereafter, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Defendant F claiming that the Plaintiff pay a certain portion of the amount of shares unpaid by the Busan District Court 2012Gahap8775 and the amount of common asset value arising from the withdrawal from membership. However, the Busan District Court’s provisions amended before the Plaintiff joined Defendant F was invalidated as exceeding the limit of the amendment regarding membership, and the Plaintiff’s membership fee at the time of joining Defendant F.