The defendant shall deliver the attached real estate indicated in C to the plaintiff at the same time. 50,000.

If Gap's evidence Nos. 2, 4, and 5 added the purport of the entire pleadings, it can be acknowledged that C, the former spouse of the plaintiff, leases real estate indicated on the attached real estate (hereinafter "real estate of this case") from the defendant on March 20, 208 to April 18, 2010 and pays 50,000,000 to the defendant as security deposit, the fact that the above lease contract was terminated, and the plaintiff received a claim for the return of security deposit from C on May 30, 2020.

Therefore, the Defendant is obliged to pay KRW 50,000,000 to the Plaintiff at the same time with delivery of the instant real estate from C, except in extenuating circumstances.

As to this, the defendant, at his own discretion, arbitrarily changed the toilet pipeline of the real estate in this case to a private line, not a vertical line, and since the toilet door door has severely damaged, the defendant argued that the deposit should deduct KRW 1,100,000 from the cost of re-installation of the home pipe pipe and door mold, but in the case of the home pipe pipe pipe, C has the duty to restore it to the cost of C because it has occurred in the winter, and it is re-determined to the duty to restore it.

C’s negligence on the sole basis of the evidence evidence No. 2 in the case of the toilet door mold

Since it is difficult to view it and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, the defendant's above assertion is rejected.

If so, the plaintiff's claim is justified.