logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.12 2017가단5090304
대여금
Text

1. The Defendants jointly and severally pay to the Plaintiff KRW 100,000,000.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

3...

Reasons

1. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as to the evidence Nos. 1 through 7 as to the cause of the claim, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the Plaintiff the money set forth in the Disposition No. 1 as part of the claim.

2. As to Defendant B’s assertion, Defendant B asserted that at the time, Defendant B, as the representative director of D Co., Ltd., who is subject to C’s deception, signed the instant guarantee agreement and signed relevant documents, and thus, it cannot comply with the Plaintiff’s claim.

However, in light of the statement of (B) guarantee certificate (B) signed by Defendant B, it is difficult to readily conclude that the Defendant prepared the above guarantee document by deceiving C with its content, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge the assertion. Thus, Defendant B’s assertion is without merit.

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow