Defendant

B shall be punished by a fine of 3.5 million won.

Defendant

B If the above fine is not paid, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2014. 4. 21. 02:30경 서울 성북구 D에 있는 E식당 앞 노상에서, 피고인의 일행인 A의 F에 대한 폭행 혐의로 112신고를 받고 출동한 서울종암경찰서 G지구대 소속 순경 H이 A을 현행범인으로 체포하려고 하자, ‘짬찌 새끼가 어디 나서냐 놔, 이 새끼야!’라고 욕설하면서 손으로 위 H의 목을 조르고, 넥타이를 잡아 뜯고 H의 허리에 차고 있던 가스총을 잡아당기는 등 폭행하여 경찰공무원의 범죄의 진압 및 수사에 관한 정당한 직무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements to F and H;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Around April 21, 2014, around 02:20, Defendant A expressed the victim’s desire to be “spawn” to the spawn victim in the “Ecafeteria” toilet operated by Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Victim F (hereinafter 56 years of age). Defendant A expressed the victim’s desire to be “spawn” at the spawn site, and the victim spawned the victim’s spawn on his hand with the victim’s hand at one time.

2. The facts charged in this part of the judgment constitute a crime of non-violation of will which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent pursuant to Article 260(3) and (1) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, it is recognized that the victim has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant A after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution against the defendant A among the facts charged in this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.