beta
Text
Defendant B shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 100,000,000 as well as 20% per annum from June 25, 2014 to the day of complete payment.
Reasons
The indication of the claim for judgment as to the claim against the defendant B: as shown in the attached Form.
The judgment of confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act). The Defendants completed the registration of ownership transfer based on sale on February 1, 2012 as to each of 1/2 shares of the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) on February 17, 2012.
Since then, the seizure of B’s shares in the instant real estate (hereinafter “instant shares”) was completed on October 2012 and January 8, 2014. On January 24, 2014, provisional seizure of KRW 6,168,93, the creditor Industrial Bank of Korea and Industrial Bank of Korea, the provisional seizure of KRW 6,168,93, the creditor’s claim amount, the provisional seizure of KRW 4,357,566, and the provisional seizure of KRW 4,357,566, March 7, 2014, respectively, was completed on March 12, 2014.
B, on April 25, 2014, with respect to the amount borrowed from the Plaintiff, a notary public made and issued to the Plaintiff a notarized deed No. 526 of 2014, No. 526 of 2014, No. 2014, No. 526 of the 2014, No. 2010, No. 1000 (hereinafter “instant No. notarial deed”).
The Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer for the instant shares based on the sale on April 3, 2014, No. 5421, which was received on April 3, 2014, (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) from the Suwon District Court, the Sungsung District Court (hereinafter “instant sales contract”).
(hereinafter “instant transfer registration”). At the time of the instant sales contract, B was in excess of the obligation with the sole property of B.
The defendants are co-principals.
[Ground of recognition] In light of the above facts of non-contentious facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the facts of the judgment as to the cause of claim as a whole of the pleadings, the act of selling the shares of this case to the defendant, which is the only property B in insolvent, constitutes a fraudulent act that reduces the creditors' joint security, and the debtor Eul is the debtor.