1. The appeal by the defendant (appointed party) is dismissed;

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the defendant (appointed party).

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is as follows: "The extinctive prescription of the loan of this case has been terminated after the lapse of the extinctive prescription of the loan of this case" of Section 1 to Section 21 to Section 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance; "No more than KRW 864,604,106 (the loan principal of KRW 500 million and overdue interest of KRW 364,604,106 out of the loan principal)" and the Seoul Central District Court's 201 KRW 4384,100,000 which had been suspended by the plaintiff's act of responding to this case is 165,60,604,106, excluding the above KRW 600,000,000,000 which had been 60,0000,000 won or less than KRW 570,000,000,000,000.