The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (ten months of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution) is too unreasonable in view of the following: (a) the summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair punishment) is against the Defendant; and (b) the agreement is reached with the victims.

2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant shows the appearance of the defendant, the vehicle of the defendant is covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance and thus the victims' recovery from damage is guaranteed, and the victims do not want the punishment of the defendant.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant under the influence of 0.188% alcohol concentration in blood alcohol level, where the defendant was unable to drive a car normally, and the victim D's E-motor vehicle driven in the same direction is driving beyond the central line after being received from the victim D's E-motor vehicle driven in the same direction, and the victim D and his E-motor vehicle driven in one lane in the opposite direction while driving beyond the central line, and again suffered two-way injury from the victim D and his passenger H, each of which was 10 days to 6 victims, each of whom was 10 days before the victim F and his passenger. The traffic accident of this case was solely caused by the defendant's unilateral negligence, and at the time, the defendant had a very high blood alcohol concentration in drinking alcohol level, and the crime was not good, and the crime was committed again by the victim D's E-motor vehicle driven in the same direction, and thus, the victim D and his passenger did not suffer any injury to the victim, even if it is possible to punish a person subject to a fine for a more severe punishment than 10 years.