(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.07.20 2016고단947

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.07.20 2016고단947

공무집행방해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 00:30 on April 6, 2016, the Defendant, at the Jeju-si, expressed a great voice in the Defendant’s residence at C Apartment 103, 703, 703, and brought about the Defendant’s denial and the Plaintiff, who was reported domestic violence, was removed from E (the remaining, 28 years of age) belonging to the Jeju-dong Police Station D, Jeju-do, where the Defendant was called for, and the Defendant was able to check the Defendant’s chests of the police officer on several occasions.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention of crimes by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the report of internal investigation (in the situation, etc. at the time of mobilization) and the report of accident settlement in 112;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. A favorable circumstance for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, taking into account the following circumstances as the reasons for sentencing, recognizing the facts of the crime as ordered: The fact of the crime is recognized and rebuttals to the effect that there is no record of being subject to criminal punishment for the obstruction of performance of official duties or for the crime of violence (the suspension of indictment was imposed on October 17, 201 due to the violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (collectively dangerous weapons, etc.) on the grounds of the crime committed by the victim police officer after the closure of the pleading, and there is no record of criminal punishment for the crime committed by the victim (the suspension of indictment was imposed on October 17, 201). Circumstances unfavorable to the fact that the damaged police officer deposited KRW 500,000 as a person under his/her care after the closure of the pleading: The fact that it is not good to be a crime

참조조문

유사 판례

-제주지방법원 2017.02.01 2016고단2754

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.11 2017고단7707

-창원지방법원 2018.07.12 2018고단1303

-광주지방법원 2018.07.25 2018노786

-의정부지방법원 2016.05.11 2016고단723