logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.04.29 2019고정848
위증
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person in charge of the interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior in the construction project for remodeling land and the ground building (hereinafter “instant construction project”) in the course of operating the construction business partnershipC.

Around 14:00 on September 12, 2018, the Defendant appeared in and taken an oath as a witness of the Seoul Western District Court 2018Kadan980 E, etc. (hereinafter “relevant criminal case”), and he testified to the effect that, in the court of Seoul Western District Court 304, the Defendant: (a) the Plaintiff was a principal subcontractor who was awarded a contract for the construction of the instant case by the FF; (b) the Plaintiff was a contracting company by the KF, and the KF was a contracting company by the KF, and the KF was a contracting company by the KFF. However, the F was not specially given a contract at the construction site of the instant case; and (c) the KF was a principal subcontractor and directly performing the entire construction work by E.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement as a witness who has taken an oath under the law.

2. Defendant B is a person in charge of electrical construction, etc. in the instant construction project while working in H a construction company H.

Around 15:00 on March 27, 2019, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the relevant criminal case in the court of Seoul Western District Court Decision 304, the Defendant testified to the effect that, in fact, F is the original subcontractor who was awarded a contract for the instant construction project, and E was a contracting company, and F was a contracting company, and that F was a contracting company, and that F was carrying out a part of the construction project in the instant construction site. However, F did not have any particular fact at the instant construction site, and H was a contracting company and directly performing the entire construction project by E.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement as a witness who has taken an oath under the law.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A copy of the police statement concerning F;

1. Each investigation report (written decisions, etc. on the binding of invoices, the submission of data by complainants, and the complainants, and confirmation of decisions, etc.);

1. A letter of commitment to the payment of construction cost, additional works.

arrow