1. Compulsory execution based on the judgment of the Cheongju District Court 2010Gahap623 case against the defendant against the plaintiff is 60.

1. On March 18, 2010, the Defendant filed a lawsuit for the claim for the payment of the amount of the Promissory Notes Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff”) and B, regardless of whether the trade name was changed, the Defendant filed a lawsuit against Cheongju District Court Decision No. 2010,623 against Cheongju District Court. On May 6, 2011, the said court rendered a judgment of the first instance that “the Plaintiff and A jointly and severally against the Defendant, jointly and severally, shall pay the amount of KRW 250,000,000 and damages for delay at a rate of 20% per annum from June 4, 2010 or from June 23, 2010 to the date of full payment (hereinafter “instant executive title”), and the Plaintiff and A appealed the judgment of the first instance, but it was difficult to dismiss the appeal as it was final and conclusive on November 1, 2011.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 (including a provisional number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 2 and 3 as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff and Eul agreed on December 16, 201 to change obligations based on the executive titles of this case with the defendant (hereinafter "the debt of this case") to KRW 200,000,000,000 on February 16, 201, and the plaintiff and Eul agreed on KRW 50,000,000, and KRW 50,000,000 on November 2, 2012, and KRW 15,00,000,000, KRW 10,000 on February 15, 2013, and KRW 10,000,000 on November 10, 2014, KRW 00,000 on the land and KRW 30,000,00 on the aggregate of these loans and KRW 30,000,305,20.