1. The part against the Defendants in the judgment of the first instance, including the claim extended and reduced in the trial, is against Plaintiff A.

1. The basic facts;

2. The Parties’ assertion;

3. The reasoning for the court’s explanation in this part is as follows: (a) the pertinent part of the judgment of the court of first instance (the “1. Basic Facts” at the lower part of the second level, “2. The allegations by the parties” at the lower part of the third surface, “3. Liability for Damages” at the lower part of the fifth surface, and “3..... Liability for Damages” at the lower part; and (b) the Defendants’ relevant parts are cited by the main text

Provided, That part of the first instance judgment shall be amended as follows:

[Revision] The "Insan City of the defendant" of the first instance judgment shall be added to "In Yangsan City of the co-defendant in the first instance trial".

The "as mentioned above" in the 6th sentence of the first instance court shall be deleted.

4. The reasoning for the court’s explanation in this part is as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance [including attached Form 2] at the bottom of Article 12 of the Civil Procedure Act. Thus, the court’s explanation in this part is acceptable as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Provided, That part of the first instance judgment shall be amended as follows:

[Revision] Part] Part 4 of the 13th judgment of the court of first instance was written by inserting " August 9, 2013" as " June 4, 2016."

Part 8-9 of the judgment of the first instance court shall be followed as follows.

[B] Calculation: 529,586,223 won (specific calculation details are the same as the statement in the daily income column of the attached Table 1 of the damages calculation table) shall be as follows: the last 14th am to 15th am to 8th am to 14th am to 5th am to 5th am to 5th am to 529,586,23 won (specific calculation details are the same as the statement in the daily income column of the attached Table

“A) In full view of the overall purport of the arguments and arguments regarding the medical expenses for the king and the expenses for the medical expenses for the medical expenses for the Guang (1) No. 29, the first instance R Hospital, and the head of the Yangsan National University Hospital, the Plaintiff A, as a result of the fact-finding, shall be entitled to KRW 42,451,00 for medical expenses at the Yangsan National University Hospital from June 4, 2016 to October 25, 2016 = 12,302,03 won for the hospitalized treatment expenses from June 4, 2016 to October 25, 2016.