A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 16, 2018, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) and the Act on Guarantee of Compensation for Automobile Damages, the Defendant driven B franchise XG car not covered by mandatory insurance in a state of about 500 meters alcohol concentration from a 500-meter section from the front of a Macheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun to the front of the church to the same Eup Myeoncheon-gun.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Bran XG car in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes.

On February 16, 2018, the Defendant driven the above car on February 22:10, 2018, and led to the flow of the road, in front of the church, from the direction of the luminous Ocheon-gun to the Macheon-Eup Sports Park.

At the time, there were nights and vehicles operated in line with the defendant's moving direction, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance, such as avoiding collision with other vehicles by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, neglected to drive a central line, led to the negligence of driving a motor vehicle in the central line, and led to the victim C (n, 41 years old) who runs a motor vehicle in the opposite lane to the traffic of the Do SM7 vehicle, was shocked by the Defendant’s driver’s franchise on the side of the driver’s seat of the motor vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant driven a car in a state where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of drinking, and suffered approximately two weeks of alcohol and tensions and tensions to the victim C, and the victim E (the victim E who was accompanied by the said SM7 car) with approximately nine weeks of treatment.

3. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act at the time and place set forth in paragraph 2, and at the same time and place, such occupational negligence as above, exchanged the victim CSS7 car.