logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.06.16 2015고단390
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service BCA110V.

Around 00:10 on December 24, 2014, the Defendant driven the above 00:0 :00, and led D hospitals located in Soyang-dong C in Goyang-gu, Goyang-si, Goyang-si to the right of the front of the D hospital from the front of the Japanese market.

At all times, crosswalks are installed on the right side of the front, so in such cases, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving service has a road to reduce speed and to see well the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the duty of care to safely circumvent.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the victim E (the age of 19) who crosses the crosswalk from the right side of the defendant's right side to the left side of the road in accordance with the pedestrian signals to go beyond the ground floor.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the victim’s non-alleys that need approximately four weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A statement of occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. An investigation report on the actual condition of traffic accidents and a report on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. Investigation report (verification of video images at the scene of the accident and statement of the suspect);

1. Medical certificates (E);

1. Signal frequency table;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by cutting off a stobane photograph and video images;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow