The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant are that there is no criminal conviction or heavier than a suspended sentence, and that the defendant is placed in an economic difficult situation, etc.

However, the Defendant already committed the instant drinking and without being aware of the history of punishment for three times due to driving without a license, one time due to driving without a license, and one time due to driving without a license, and the Defendant committed the instant drinking and without a license. The Defendant was sentenced to a fine due to driving without a license, and the blood alcohol concentration was significantly high by 0.249% due to not being sentenced to a fine due to driving without a license, and the blood alcohol concentration was extremely high by 0.249%. Furthermore, the Defendant’s occurrence of a risk of causing serious casualties by violating the signal and shocking urban buses, and the Defendant’s age, character, character, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of committing the instant crime, and all the sentencing conditions as shown in the instant records and arguments, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., it cannot be said that the sentence imposed by the lower court is unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.