The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) that the court below sentenced (the imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months and the order to complete a sexual assault treatment program for not less than forty hours) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the judgment defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected it is favorable to the defendant.

However, even though the Defendant had been already punished twice for the same crime (two years of probation on November 3, 2008, and imprisonment on November 21, 2014), the Defendant committed the instant crime again despite the previous record of punishment (two years of probation on November 3, 2008, and suspension of execution on August 21, 2014), and it appears that the Defendant suffered losses due to the Defendant’s criminal act would not cause much displeasure and mental impulses, and in the appellate trial, there was no change in circumstances that could change the sentence of the lower court, such as the agreement with the victim, etc., comprehensive consideration of all the conditions of sentencing on records and changes in the instant case where there was no change in circumstances that make it possible for the Defendant to change the sentence of the lower court to be sentenced,

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.