beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, by imprisonment for four months and by imprisonment for four months.
However, for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is the representative director of “F”, which is the printing company of the cosmetic packing materials in light name, and Defendant B is the above F.
On February 12, 2018, at the entrance of the F Building parking lot around 18:00, the Defendants found the victim G (52 tax) to have reported this side, and stated that “the victim who intends to leave the place should not see the side at this place” to the victim who intends to leave the place. However, whether the victim “Nea Ga Ga Ga Ga” is superior or not.
"In the process of spitation or spitation with the defendants' face, etc. over several occasions, the defendants B made spit spitation with the victim's fat, made the victim's fat with the hand, fat with the hand fat face, the defendant A fatd with the victim's fat face, fatd with the victim's fat, fatd with the victim's fat, fatd with the victim's fat, and fatd with the victim's face with the concrete floor."
As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted injury on the victims, such as brain ties, acute breathothal transfusion, and dudual breathal surgery, which require approximately eight weeks of medical treatment.
In light of the following circumstances: (a) in the case of a public principal offender, the method and form of the crime, the number of participants and their inclinations, the time and place of the crime, the possibility of contact with others in the course of the crime, the possibility of contact with others, etc. may be anticipated or sufficiently anticipated by the conspiracys to be an incidental crime during the commission of the crime or going further to achieve the purpose; (b) the conspiracys did not take any reasonable measures sufficient to prevent the occurrence of another crime; and (c) if the conspiracys led to the crime, even though there was no contact with each other as to one of the derivative crimes, if there was no contact with each other, the conspiracys ought to be deemed to exist, as well as functional control over the whole crime (see Supreme Court Decision 2010Da10688, Dec. 12, 2010).