logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2019.05.29 2018고정397
응급의료에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 31, 2018, from around 23:03 to 23:12 of the same day, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol in the 11th emergency area in the C Hospital Emergency Area B located in the Gu during the Gyeonggi-si, provided that an emergency medical technician who intends to treat the victim’s face “whether he will be able to be able to be punished,” and provided sexual insult, and provided a medical doctor with an desire to “I am Do Do Do Do ? Do Do . Do ? Do ? Do Do ? ? ? ? Do Do ? ? ? ? ? ? Do ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? by hand, obstructed the victim’s first-aid treatment or treatment for the emergency patient, who is an emergency medical personnel, by pushing the victim’

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in court (the third trial date);

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Statements made by witnesses D and F in the second trial records;

1. Photographs of damaged parts;

1. A CD [the victim has consistently made a statement from an investigative agency to this court; the witness E’s statement, the victim’s photo, and the CCTV, etc. taken in part of the scene of the crime at the time of the crime conforms to the victim’s statement. There is no reasonable or contradictory part in light of the empirical rule in light of the content of the victim’s statement and E’s statement; there is no special motive or circumstance for the victim to gather the defendant by taking over the risk that the said witness would be punished for a false accusation or perjury; nor there is no other circumstance to suspect the credibility of the above statement. According to the above evidence, there is no other circumstance to suspect the credibility of the statement. The application of the law to the victim’s statement can be sufficiently recognized according to the aforementioned evidence).

1. Article 60(1)1 of the pertinent Act on criminal facts and Article 60(1)1 and Article 12 of the former Emergency Medical Service Act on the Selection of Punishment, etc. (Amended by Act No. 16252, Jan. 15, 2019); Selection of fines

1. Articles 70(1) and 69 of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

arrow