logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.04.17 2015고정145
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 10, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Jeju District Court, 2 years of suspended execution, and 20,000 won, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 18, 2014.

On October 28, 2014, from around 17:18 to around 17:38 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) found the state of drinking in Jeju-si C’s Dmpt; and (b) expressed two desire to “choping” without any reason to the victim E (a person, a person, aged 51) who is the owner of the relevant place of business; (c) made a sexual harassment on the part of his/her part; and (d) made a sexual harassment on the part of his/her part; and (e) took place, the Defendant was unable to avoid disturbance for about 20 minutes.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate business of the victim by force.

B. On June 28, 2014, around 13:45, the Defendant: (a) found the state of drinking in the F apartment No. 1 route of Jeju, and then made intimidation, such as: (b) the victim G (V, 67 years of age) who was satisfing in his/her place; (c) satisfing the satis in his/her hand; (d) satisfing the satis; (d) satisfing the satis; and (e) forcing the victim to feel.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement prepared by E, G and H;

1. Previous records: Criminal records and other inquiries, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (verification of the facts of sentencing a separate case);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: Articles 314(1) and 283(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of intimidation and the defense counsel of the defendant claimed that the defendant agreed with the victim on March 19, 2015, but there is no evidence to support the agreement) and the selection of each fine;

1. Concurrent handling: The latter part of Article 37 and the former part of Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes: former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) and 38 (2) and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Detention at a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Provisional payment order: The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the following circumstances:

The favorable circumstances: all of the facts of crime are recognized and reflected.

arrow