The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Defendant A of the instant facts charged is a person operating “D” selling a cartoon “C” card.

A. On June 17, 2017, around 18:34, 2017, the Defendant: (a) posted a victim F’s photograph searched and searched from the Roster “E” as the title “E” on the Defendant’s NAB Blobb Blob Blob, and then posted it; and (b) opened a letter upon the Defendant’s request to compensate for fraud in the state of “G B’s fraud”, and then, (c) sold such waste at this high-priced level, and then withdrawn from the Kaf, so far as it is too difficult for the Defendant to sell it.

Absted only once, but it is thought that it is identical, clear and fraudulent, and the writing " shall be drawn up"; and

B. On March 14, 2018, around 17:09, the victim F made a judgment of not guilty on the part of the Defendant F’s comments posted by the Defendant F, and without deletion of the comments, the victim F will file a complaint.

However, the Defendant’s “Neman as Hah Hah

^^, 참고로 평생 안 내릴 거에요 구매자분께 사기 보상해 주시 길~~~, 무죄판결 ㅋㅋ 누가 무죄판결 내려 줬는데요 구매한 사람은 피눈물 흘리고 있는데, 그러게 사기 같은 거 치면 안되시죠

ㅜㅜ ”라고 글을 게재하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly inserting false facts.

2. Each of the facts charged in the instant case is a crime falling under Article 70(2) of the Act on Promotion of the Utilization of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc., and each of such crimes cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s will specifically manifested pursuant to Article 70(3) of the same Act.

In doing so, according to the contents of the non-exclusive statement of punishment bound in the trial records, the victim F of each of the crimes under the facts charged of this case can be acknowledged as having expressed his/her intention not to want the punishment against the defendant on October 30, 2018, which was after the institution of the prosecution of this case.

If so, this case is wholly damaged.