1. The Plaintiff:

A. As to Defendant A corporation, B, and C, jointly and severally KRW 203,552,583 and KRW 61,112,446.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. Fact 1) The Plaintiff is the Defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) around December 18, 2003.

B) In order to guarantee the payment of deposits arising from the Gyeonggi-gun H’s permission for changing the form and quality of land, the Defendant Company entered into an insurance policy with the term “insurance coverage period from December 18, 2003 to June 30, 2006, and KRW 82,556,000”. Defendant B, C and deceased G (Death January 14, 2010, hereinafter “the deceased”).

(B) The Defendant Company jointly and severally guaranteed the liability for indemnity against the Plaintiff. (B) On September 7, 2009, the Plaintiff paid KRW 82,556,000 to Pyeongtaek-gun of the insured on September 7, 2006, when an insured event that the Defendant Company failed to perform the forest recovery following the revocation of permission for conversion of mountainous district, and the Plaintiff paid KRW 82,56,000. (c) The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking reimbursement against the Defendant Company, the Defendant Company B, C, and the Deceased (Seoul Central District Court 2006Da414602), and on March 14, 2007, “The Defendant Company and the Deceased” and the Deceased jointly and severally paid the Plaintiff KRW 82,56,00 and the amount calculated at a rate of 19% per annum from September 8, 2006 to January 23, 2007, and 20% per annum from the next day to the date of full payment (hereinafter “instant judgment”).

)이 선고되었고, 위 판결은 그 무렵 확정되었다. 라. 망인의 상속인으로 처인 피고 D과 자녀들인 피고 E, F이 있었다. 피고 D, E, F의 특별한정승인 신고(서울가정법원 2016느단52560호)가 2017. 3. 23. 수리되었다. 마. 한편 원고의 구상금 채권의 원금 중 일부가 2014. 2. 13. 회수된 후 잔금 61,112,446원이 변제되지 않았고, 2015. 9. 30.까지의 이 사건 판결에 따른 확정 지연손해금이 142,440,137원이다. [인정 근거] 다툼 없는 사실, 갑 1∼6호증, 을 1∽4호증(가지번호 있는 것은 가지번호 포함 의 각 기재, 변론 전체의 취지

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the Plaintiff is entitled to receive the judgment.