Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, for one year, for one year, and for four months, for each of the defendants C.

except that this shall not apply.

Punishment of the crime

【2012 Highest 3012】

1. On August 25, 2012, Defendants A and B violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) priceed the face and body of the victims of drinking and drinking and drinking as a result of interference with the passage of a vehicle on which Defendants A and B were on the street in front of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul, with the victim I(36 years of age) and the victim J (39 years of age) on the ground that they obstructed the passage of a vehicle on which they were on board.

As a result, the Defendants jointly put the victim I into the left-hand side, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and put the victimJ on the back-hand side and the back-hand side, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

2. Defendant B

A. The Defendant, at the above date, at the above time, and at the above place, the victim K(26 years of age) and the victim L(26 years of age) who used the path while assaulting I and J as above were prevented. The Defendant, by hand, took the victim L’s back water once, batd the victim K’s bat, and batd the face by drinking.

나. 공무집행방해 피고인은 위 일시, 장소에서 폭행사건이 벌어졌다는 112신고를 받고 출동한 성동경찰서 소속 경찰관 M가 피고인이 위 K에게 달려들려는 것을 제지한다는 이유로 “씨발, 나 가만히 놔둬, 니가 뭔데 지랄이야”라고 욕설하면서 위 M의 멱살을 잡아 흔들고 야광조끼를 찢었다.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the above M and interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the on-site visit work.

【2013 Highest 2619】

1. The Defendant B and the Victim C (the age of 54) are between Defendant B and the Victim C (the age of 54).

On May 20, 201, the Defendant: (a) around 22:00, at the office located in the used vehicle A, Dong 2, Dong-dong, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, a used vehicle trading market located in N, and (b) at one time, on the ground that the victim was able to drink the victim’s right eye due to drinking, and (c) on the ground that the victim was suffering from drinking expenses, the Defendant saw the victim to undergo approximately two weeks of treatment.

[Judgment of the court below]