logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.09.23 2015고단643
강제추행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 22, 2015, at around 19:50, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim’s left side by sabling sab within the D shop located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on his hand on the left side of the victim E (n.e., 27 years of age).

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the respective legal statements of witness E and F to the Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act and Article 298 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Where a conviction of a defendant against a sex crime subject to registration becomes final and conclusive on the judgment that constitutes a sex crime subject to registration under Article 16(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order, the defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and is obligated to

In light of the Defendant’s age, risk of repeating a crime, type, motive, process, consequence and seriousness of the crime in this case, disclosure order or notification order, the degree of disadvantage and anticipated side effects of the Defendant’s entry, the preventive effect and effect of the sexual crime subject to registration which may be achieved therefrom, the effect of the protection of the victim, the favorable circumstances as seen earlier, etc., the Defendant shall not be ordered to disclose or notify personal information pursuant to Articles 47(1) and 49(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, the proviso to Article 49(1) and the proviso to Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, and thus, the Defendant shall not be ordered to issue the disclosure order or notification order.

arrow