1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The plaintiff, the defendant 1, the defendant 1, the defendant 251,84 won.

(b) cannot be viewed as a defect, contrary to the design drawings;

[Recognizing that the result of the appraisal by the appraiser of the first instance trial (including the result of each fact-finding by the appraiser of the first instance court; hereinafter the same shall apply), it is recognized that the design drawing was modified and constructed to a general-use fish-line, even though it is written as a fire-fighting style, and the design drawing was constructed with a thickness of 3 meters, at 0.75 meters, even though the thickness of the waterproof diver was 3 meters, which may hinder the function of waterproof and may hinder the safety of the design.

[Public 18] Change and Construction (Public 27) of the Specifications of each roof ridge (in the inside) shall not be deemed to be a defect solely with the alteration, construction, or insufficient construction (unconstruction) if it does not hinder the safety, function, or aesthetic view of the thickness of the roof ridge C (in the inside).

[Recognizing the result of the appraisal by the appraiser of the first instance trial, it is recognized that the size of each material in the roof floor is modified and constructed to 45*45, not 40*45, but 40*40, the thickness of PURIN(China) C in the roof sloping roof is not 3.2m, not 3.2m, and it is found that the thickness of PURRIN(China) C in the roof sloping roof falls short of the design specifications. Accordingly, it is recognized that the failure of the parties to the dispute, such as durability, to the extent that it may hinder the function and safety

[Public 23] There was no explicit instruction for construction of water cut home in the design drawings and other instructions of the apartment apartment of this case, which was constructed outside water of the ELV. machine window (AG), and there was no case of water leakage due to the non-construction. Thus, it cannot be viewed as a defect.

[Recognizing that construction of the elevator machinery room is a normal construction method, and the appraiser's appraisal result is reasonable that the elevator machinery room is likely to flow as a result of the above non-construction.

[Public 51] ELV. SHAFT wall mpires removal and defluor disposal (public 60) defluoration and defluor disposal (defluor, etc.) of underground PIT wall mpires (de, etc.).