logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2014.02.13 2013노829
사기등
Text

Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

The defendant 504,00 won to AI who is an applicant for compensation, and 500.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The punishment sentenced by the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. In full view of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and other various circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant had been punished several times as a single crime, without being aware of the fact that the defendant had been punished for a repeated crime even though it is a repeated crime, and that the amount of money that the defendant stolen or stolen through several times exceeds 30 million won, and that the victim and the defendant did not reach an agreement, and that he did not reach an agreement with the victims, etc., the defendant and the prosecutor's assertion is not reasonable because the court below's punishment is too heavy or it is unreasonable because of the circumstances after the crime, etc.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. Since the application for compensation order by the applicant for compensation filed in the trial against each application for compensation order by the AI and the CA, the application for compensation order by the applicant for compensation filed in the trial is with merit, it is ordered to compensate the defendant under Articles 25(1), 31(1) and (2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, and it is ordered to attach a provisional execution declaration under Article 31(3)

arrow