logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.07.07 2014고단3158
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving freight B and is a holder of the above freight truck.

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act: (a) around 09:20 on July 1, 2014, the Defendant driving the above cargo vehicle, leading directly to the front side of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City C, along the three-lane 4-lanes from the surface of the YYYYYYY, to the seat of the World Cup stadium.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to drive a motor vehicle by accurately operating the steering gear, steering gear and brake system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to perform his duty at the time of Jeonju, and neglected to drive the above cargo vehicle as it is, reported that the E K7 car driven by the victim D (the age of 34) will stop at the intersection in the front of the road, but it did not reach the above cargo vehicle, and received the part of the back part of the said vehicle as the front part of the cargo vehicle.

The Defendant caused the foregoing traffic accident, thereby causing the victim D to suffer scopic scopical scophers, etc., which require approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and caused the victim F (F, who is the passenger of the damaged vehicle, to suffer scopic scophers, etc., requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment. At the same time, the Defendant damaged the victim D’s scopic scophers, etc., which are KRW 3,544,868 of repair cost.

2. No automobile which is not covered by the mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be operated on a road;

Nevertheless, at around 09:20 on July 1, 2014, the Defendant operated B Poter truck not covered by mandatory insurance from a place where the Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Office was unknown to the intersection of the 3rd World Cup-dong, Mapo-gu, Seoul.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D and F;

1. Investigation report on the actual condition of traffic accidents, and mandatory insurance;

1. An investigation report (Submission of a medical certificate and written estimate) - each medical certificate and written estimate to be attached.

arrow