1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the basic facts in this court are as follows. Each “A” of the two pages 2, 17, 3 pages 1, and 2 as “Defendant”, “Defendant 2” as “Defendant,” and “Defendant 3” as “G religious organization’s correction, other than each correction, is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance. Therefore, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the defendant issued this case's bill to J. The J issued this case's bill to K, and K transferred to the plaintiff the claims stated in the above bill's bill, so the plaintiff is a legitimate right holder who has opposing power by taking over the right to use and benefit from a charnel house according to the above bill's bill. The above bill's right to use and benefit is expressed in the above bill's right to use and benefit, and the final holder can exercise his right even if he does not have opposing power. Since the above bill's bill's certificate is a bill's certificate issued by the defendant, the plaintiff's refusal of the plaintiff's right constitutes abuse of rights, and thus the plaintiff's right to use and benefit is in violation of the principle

B. (1) Since the contract for the sale of a charnel with the content that the seller of a container gives the authority to exclusively occupy and use a charnel house to the buyer, the contract is binding only on the parties to the contract, since the contract is a bond contract.

In addition, since the contract for sale is established by the agreement between the parties, the certificate was prepared and delivered while the contract for sale was concluded.

It is reasonable to view that the deed does not be bound by a third party, such as a party to the agreement, unless it does not meet the requirements for setting up against the transfer of claims because the certificate is distributed entirely.

Therefore, this part of the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

The Plaintiff’s judgment on the assignment of the claims is indicated in the instant salary certificate.