The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Around 17:50 on Nov. 28, 1996, B, an employee of the Defendant, was in violation of the Defendant’s duty to load 12 tons of steel bars and 12 tons of steel bars at the 3.4km-line 10km-line 3.4km-line 3.4km-line 10 tons of the c truck, although he could not load more than 10 tons per stock at the 3.4km-line 17:50 on his duty.

2. The prosecutor of the judgment applied Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005) to the facts charged in the instant case, but the Constitutional Court rendered a decision on Oct. 28, 2010 (amended by Act No. 2014, Oct. 14, 15, 2010; 21, 27, 35, 38, 34, and 70 (merged) of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 832 of Oct. 28, 2010) that "where an agent, employee, or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, the corporation shall also be punished by a fine under the relevant provisions of Article 8

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.