The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (ten months of imprisonment without prison labor, two years of suspended execution, and eight hours of social service) is too unfasible.

2. The judgment below neglected the duty of Jeonju City, caused a traffic accident that leads to a wide-area road by entering a narrow road to the left-hand left-hand turn, thereby causing serious injury to the victim, such as booming expenses, etc. The victim was faced with the victim's help while performing his daily activities. Nevertheless, even though it is recognized that the victim has not reached an agreement with the victim until now, the defendant is aware that he was unable to reach an agreement with the victim, but the defendant is guilty of criminal facts, the defendant is the primary offender, the vehicle driven by the defendant was covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, the defendant is old, the vehicle driven by the defendant is old, the defendant was insured, the defendant deposited 3 million won at the court below at the court below, the defendant deposited 3 million won at the court below, the defendant deposited 3 million won at the court below for the victim, and the chief glass of the damaged vehicle damaged by negligence, and the victim did not wear the safety labelling at the time of the accident.

Considering the fact that the instant accident appears to have contributed to the occurrence of the accident and the expansion of the damage, and other various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of the Defendant, such as character, conduct, family environment, health conditions, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too uneasible and unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.