The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant only had in person with the victim G and did not have any physical contact with the victim E.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous and adversely affected by the judgment.

In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court, the lower court’s determination on the grounds for appeal can be recognized that the Defendant assaulted twice the chest part of the victim G, as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the lower judgment, and inflicted an injury on the victim E, by exceeding the upper part of the chest part of the victim E.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is just, and there is no error of law as alleged by the defendant.

In the investigative agency and the court of the court below, G stated to the effect that “E, before the building stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment below, was pushed down two times, was arriving at the site of this case and later arrived at the site of this case, and that “E was in contact with the family and became in the site of this case, and the Defendant got in contact with the family, and exceeded the upper part of the bar by the Defendant’s shicking the chest.”

G and E consistently made a consistent statement from the investigative agency to the court of the original trial, and specifically made statements concerning the developments leading up to the occurrence of the instant case, the situation at the time of the instant case, and the part of the assault, etc., and the content of the statement also conforms to the overall statements in H and I investigative agency and the court of the original instance as seen below. Although there are some differences between G and E’s statements about the place where the instant case occurred and G and E’s statements about the location where the instant case occurred, such as “the car center’s inside” and “parking parking lot”, the car center is located on the first floor of the said building, and there is a parking lot in the future, and at the time the said