logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.29 2016가단5066960
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 27,250,354 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from April 28, 2013 to November 29, 2016.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. On April 28, 2013, B:22:45 on April 28, 2013, B is a business taxi (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

) A driver of the Seoul Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City D shooting distance along the three-lanes of the apartment road in the direction of the scamtain, along the three-lanes of the scamtain in the direction of the scamtain, and the passenger was lowered along the three-lanes to the opposite line from the third-lanes, and the plaintiff who dried the crosswalk on the left side of the defendant's vehicle in accordance with the pedestrian progress signals from the two-lanes to the front-hander of the defendant's vehicle, and caused the plaintiff to suffer the plaintiff's image, conical signboard escape, textile scick, etc. (hereinafter referred to as the "accident of this case").

(2) The Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement on the Defendant’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 to 2 evidence, Gap 1 to 4 evidence (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the facts of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damages caused by the accident in this case as a mutual aid business operator of defendant vehicle.

C. The instant accident subject to limitation of liability is an unreasonable attempt for U.S. vehicles that run three lanes among three laness, in violation of U.S. method.

Although the main cause of the occurrence is that the Plaintiff, while crossing the road, did not look closely at the movement of the vehicle while crossing the road, and the Plaintiff’s fault going beyond the crosswalk, and such negligence is deemed to have caused the expansion of the damages of this case. Therefore, the Defendant’s liability is limited to 80% by taking account of this, given that the Plaintiff’s negligence was the cause

(2) Except as otherwise stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each item of the attached Table of the calculation of damages shall be the same as the corresponding item of the calculation of damages, and the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis in principle, but less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The amount of damages.

arrow