The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and 80 hours of sexual assault treatment course) is too uneased and unreasonable;

2. The crime of this case was committed against the police assigned for special guard of a bank in which the defendant had been employed as a police assigned for special guard, installed a bank's escape room, or a mobile phone with an abnormal person in a toilet, and taken the body of the victims after sunset. In light of the background and content leading up to the crime, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, period of the crime, etc., the crime was poor, and the victim caused the victims to feel a severe sense of sexual humiliation, etc.

However, in full view of the following factors: (a) the Defendant led to the instant crime and committed the instant crime for about 70 days through confinement; (b) the first offender who has no criminal record; (c) the victims of the instant crime; and (d) the fact that the lower court agreed with the victims of the instant crime; and (c) other various factors of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, family environment, and circumstances before and after the instant crime, the Defendant’s sentence against the Defendant

3. If so, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.