beta
Text
1. Defendant B’s KRW 3,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from December 23, 2016 to January 25, 2018, respectively, to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
Basic Facts
Defendant D is an owner who has completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the land E ownership of real estate E 4264 square meters of forest land E 4,264 square meters of forest E - on December 31, 1996 (hereinafter “instant land”); and all of the land shall be indicated as the same Ri area and the lot number area).
Defendant B, on the ground of F religion site 255 square meters and 255 square meters, constructed cement bricks, earth and bridges, and 115.7 square meters (hereinafter “the instant substitute field”), and completed each registration of preservation of ownership on November 24, 1987, with respect to F religion site 25 square meters and the instant substitute field.
On April 7, 2011, the F Religious Site 255 square meters and the Grand Baro of this case had completed the registration of ownership transfer on April 7, 201, and on December 7, 2012, the Plaintiff was awarded a contract and completed each registration of ownership transfer on December 7, 2012 (Voluntary Auction Procedure for Changwon District Court Gowon Branch G Auction Procedure).
Around the time when Defendant B constructed the instant 378 square meters and 378 square meters prior to H, Defendant B constructed a wooden pole and 74.5 square meters for single-story bonds (unregistered buildings; hereinafter “instant cryp bonds”) on the ground above H 378 square meters, and completed the registration of ownership preservation on September 3, 1993 with respect to the 378 square meters prior to H.
In the above auction procedure, the Plaintiff was awarded a successful bid for 378 square meters and the bonds of this case prior to H, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the 378 square meters prior to H on December 7, 2012.
【Land and Building-Related Records】 【Ma-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-
There are a number of buildings between erode and erode bonds of this case, and among them there are inspection buildings operated by Defendant B.
In other words, only part of the entire temple buildings was awarded a successful bid by the plaintiff, and the defendant B and the plaintiff side operated the temple separately from each of their own buildings and caused conflicts.
[Attachment 1] L.