logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.12.09 2018누76387
재정비촉진구역 결정고시처분 무효확인의 소
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The grounds for this part of the disposition are as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, this part of the disposition is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. The National Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association (hereinafter referred to as the “instant partnership”) in the 9th 9th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth g eth eth eth eth

From the fourth to the fourth parallel of the 4th parallel of the earth, the 5th parallel of the 5th parallel of the earth shall be as follows:

(2) On February 5, 2008, the Defendant Mayor: (a) designated an urban renewal acceleration district to be changed from 821,00 square meters to 89,302 square meters; (b) designated an urban renewal acceleration district pursuant to Article 5(1) of the former Urban Renewal Act (amended by Act No. 8786, Dec. 21, 2007; (c) and Article 4(1) of the former Enforcement Decree of the Urban Renewal Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 20722, Feb. 29, 2008; hereinafter referred to as the “former Enforcement Decree of the Urban Renewal Act”); (d) determined the urban renewal acceleration district to be included in the urban renewal acceleration district (hereinafter referred to as the “instant urban renewal acceleration district”); and (e) determined the urban renewal acceleration district as a new renewal acceleration district (hereinafter referred to as the “new renewal acceleration district”); and (e) determined the urban renewal acceleration district to be included in the urban renewal acceleration district (hereinafter referred to as the “instant renewal acceleration district”).

(of the determination of the urban renewal acceleration plan, the part which designated the urban renewal acceleration zone of this case among the determination of the urban renewal acceleration plan of this case is referred to as "the determination and public notice of this case" of 5 pages shall be deemed to be "the determination and public notice of this case".

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The gist of the plaintiffs' assertion 1) The defendant market designating the renewal promotion zone of this case as housing redevelopment project zone.

arrow