A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 12, 2017, the Defendant drinked a mixed drinking at C cafeteria located in Busan Metropolitan City B around 21:02, but, as above, the victim D of the injury case for which a suspended sentence is rendered, did not pay his/her money to himself/herself. However, the Defendant discarded the D’s death of the E apartment unit.

After making a 112 report with the content of “,” one would drive a vehicle for lurged passenger of the Farb, so that the said D would go to the E-family apartment in Busan Metropolitan City where the said D resides.

At around 21:50 on the same day, the Defendant had been driving to H and I for the police officers belonging to the police station G police station G police box called up after receiving the above 112 report in front of the above apartment house, which was in a serious and inaccurate manner, on the same day.

“A person who was driven under the influence of alcohol” such as “a person under the influence of alcohol.

There are reasonable grounds to determine a person, who is requested by the above H and I to respond to the measurement of drinking by inserting the breath in a breath measuring instrument, and "refluence by a sofriing soften", and went to the G police box located in theJ in Gyeongsan-si.

On October 12, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received a request from the above I to respond to the measurement of drinking in the same manner as once again; (b) the Defendant did not have any string that “I am son, son son, son son son son, son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son, son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son her hand, and the Defendant avoided the above I son son slebbling with his son son son her hand, who was off his her slebbling at around 207 on the same day.”

Accordingly, the defendant interferes with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes, and demands for a police officer's drinking test without justifiable grounds.