logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.12.06 2018고정638
근로자퇴직급여보장법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is an employer who runs C in Ulsan-gu, Southern-gu.

Defendant did not pay KRW 7,030,685 of the retirement allowances of D who retired from the said workplace as an unborn offender from October 26, 2014 to February 28, 2018.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-violation of will: The proviso to Article 44 of the Guarantee of Retirement Benefits of Workers;

(b) Workers D shall express their intention not to be subject to punishment after the institution of public prosecution;

(c) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow