beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Damage to property;
A. On July 15, 2017, at around 00:01, the Defendant 00-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si
After that, the victim was suffering from disturbance, such as setting the entrance door of the entrance, which was in the corridor when the victim was suffering from war, and without any choice, the victim opened the door and entered the door, and then damaged the victim's property by gathering one misunderstanding of the market price and one studle of the market price equivalent to 30,000 won.
B. On the 25th 23:00 of the same month, the Defendant: (a) found the above apartment again and caused the victim not to open the door; (b) opened a door to the victim without any choice; and (c) destroyed the victim’s property by gathering one studle map and one 30,000 won of the market price.
2. On the 28th day of the same month, the Defendant, who interfered with the performance of official duties, re-exploiting the above apartment for the foregoing reasons in front of the entrance of the same place as the preceding paragraph.
He was urged to return home from the police officer F, etc. who belongs to the police police box of the Ulsan-do Police Station E commander of the police station in the Ulsan-do, where he was called after having been reported that he was frighting and frighting, but she took a bath, such as “salping out”, and she saw that he was frighting to open the entrance, and she was fright to stop the Defendant’s entry into the above D’s residence from the above security F, and obstructed the above police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the reported case.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and D;
1. Criminal facts;