logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.08.11 2015고단3189
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 4,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On November 7, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 23:50, the Defendant: (b) at the H main point in the operation of the Victim G in Yongsan-gu, U.S., U.S., U.S., the Defendant had a conflict of opinions; and (c) during the process, the Defendant was in conflict with each other, for the reason that the Defendant is bad, he was in the face of B in the form of drinking in a manner without cutting the jackets; (d) climbing the main mee, ging the main mee, glab, ging the main mee; (e) cutting the main mee, ging the shock; (e) cutting the shock of the shoulder glass; and (e) cut the shock of the shock; and (e) cutting the Handphone, etc. in the back 180,000 won due to repair costs, etc.

B. When the Defendant was informed of the occurrence of such violence as above, and received a restraint from the police officer J, the police officer belonging to the Hansan Police Station I District of the 112 police station, the Defendant attempted to take a drinking soldier in order to threaten the above police officer, and prevented the police officer K again, thereby obstructing the police officer’s performance of official duties by assaulting the police officer K’s face part of the police officer’s face once.

2. Defendant B obstructed the police officer’s performance of official duties by putting the police officer’s body on the floor and putting the police officer’s body in front of A at the date, time, and place of the foregoing paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's legal statement (as at the fourth public trial date);

1. Each police statement made to K, J and G;

1. Defendant B committed assault to the extent that it could interfere with the police officer’s performance of duties by taking into account the process, process, and method and content of exercising force against police officers J, such as the police officer’s photographic materials, etc., ctv video cd (the process and process of Defendant B, known by the aforementioned evidence)

[Judgment of the court below]

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts;

(a) Defendant A: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of destroying property);

B. Defendant.

arrow