beta
Text
1. Defendant A and Defendant B jointly share 26,350,33 won with the Plaintiff’s succeeding Intervenor, and Defendant International sirens Co., Ltd.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff entered into a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance contract with C and D with the insurance coverage period from March 23, 2014 to March 23, 2015, including a special agreement on indemnity by an uninsured motor vehicle with the coverage amounting to KRW 500 million (hereinafter “non-insurance special agreement”).
The Defendant International Penecar Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) leased the Defendant vehicle to Defendant A from May 25, 2014 to May 26, 201, as the owner of the E rocketing car (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).
B. On May 26, 2014, Defendant B received a request from Defendant A, the vessel owner, to return the Defendant’s vehicle to the Defendant Company, and, on May 12:10, 2014, driven the Defendant’s vehicle and proceeded from the old Sinsi-dong to the Geumsi-si Sin Sin Sin Sinsi-dong, Defendant B received the back portion of the Plaintiff’s vehicle in the signal signal atmosphere as the front portion of the Defendant’s vehicle due to negligence while neglecting the duty of Jeonsi-si in the front direction while driving the vehicle from the Gunsi-dong to the Geumsi-si, the lower part of the FF vehicle’s left behind the front side of the Defendant vehicle, which was pushed down by the Plaintiff’s vehicle and proceeded to the Hansi-si apartment.
(hereinafter “instant accident”). The instant accident, which is the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, suffered injury, such as inside the upper upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and the Plaintiff’s vehicle was damaged to the extent that the repair cost of KRW 11,215,719 was needed.
C. C demanded compensation for damage caused by the instant accident to the National Lenecar Mutual Aid Association, which entered into a mutual aid agreement with Defendant Vehicles. However, the said Mutual Aid Association rejected compensation on the ground that Defendant B operated the Defendant Vehicles without Defendant Company’s consent, and caused the instant accident. Accordingly, the Defendant Vehicle constitutes “non-insurance” under the standard terms and conditions for automobile insurance.
The plaintiff shall be the medical expenses of C from July 22, 2014 to January 29, 2015 in accordance with the non-insurance agreement.