Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 25, 2014, the Defendant driven CCA 110 Oba, around 20:08, while driving at the crosswalk in front of the “carogate” located in Heung-gu, Gwangju, and driving at the crosswalk in front of the “carogate,” one-lane from the “carogate,” the Defendant was on the front side of the said d (20 years old), the victim D (the 20-year-old), who was unsignaled from the right side of the crosswalk without any signal, etc. due to negligence, was negligent in driving at the front of the two-lane.

The Defendant suffered injury to the victim by occupational negligence during approximately 12 weeks of medical treatment. The Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the left-hand tree and the alley.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements (D);

1. The actual condition survey report, accident site photographs, etc.;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of the fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Probation Act, Article 69 of the Act on Probation, etc. causes a traffic accident by gross negligence that the defendant is in violation of the duty to protect pedestrians in the crosswalk, the victim suffered considerable bodily injury that requires approximately 12 weeks medical treatment due to the above traffic accident, and the defendant committed the crime of this case without due care even though he had the record of being punished for the same kind of crime in the past.

However, the defendant's mistake is divided in depth, and the vehicle of the defendant is subscribed to liability insurance. In particular, on June 17, 2014, the defendant does not want the punishment of the defendant, and the defendant does not want the punishment of the defendant. Other conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.