1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A is a building listed in the separate sheet;

B. Defendant B is among the first floor of the building indicated in the attached list.

1. The Plaintiff: (a) was implementing E-Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project (hereinafter “instant rearrangement project”); (b) on December 4, 2009, the Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si; (c) authorized the implementation of the instant rearrangement project on December 28 and November 30, 2016; (d) formulated a management and disposal plan of the instant rearrangement project on June 26, 2017; and (e) the Plaintiff announced the above management and disposal plan on June 26, 2017; (c) Defendant A applied for cash on the list of the buildings located in the instant rearrangement project zone (hereinafter “instant building”); (d) the Plaintiff, as the owner of the said site; and (e) the Plaintiff, as the lessee of the instant building; and (e) the Plaintiff, as the owner of the instant building, was 10,350 square meters; and (e) the Plaintiff was 200,000 square meters of the instant building and 36,000 square meters of each of the instant plot of land to be expropriateded by 1, 36.

Therefore, as the implementer of the instant improvement project, the Plaintiff holding the right to use and benefit from the instant building, and Defendant A, barring any special circumstance, has the duty to deliver each of the above possession of the instant building, Defendant B, and C, to the Plaintiff, barring any specific circumstance.

2. As to the assertion by Defendant A, it is difficult for Defendant A to accept the compensation amount under the instant adjudication on expropriation because it is too low.